encouraging news.....
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/wisconsin/election_2008_wisconsin_presidential_election
Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Pennsylvania are states that McCain has to make Democrats nervous. With George W Bush's low approval ratings I am fine with voting for John McCain in 2008, if W had been a more successful President I would want a more conservative Candidate. If we lose the Presidential election and seats in both houses of congress the party is in big trouble. The previously mentioned states will most likely want a candidate without all the flare and more of the experience which is why I think John McCain may have more appeal in those states than W.
as a side not some of his popularity in Wisconsin may come from his work with Feingold.
Wednesday, May 7, 2008
Rush helps Hillary in Indiana
Its seems operation chaos paid off in Indiana. Clinton is the stronger general election candidate, but she has no chance of winning. This is good for the Republicans. The GOP must unite behind McCain win the 2008 presidential election and then start from scratch in Congress. The congressional GOP is weak and needs reform.
Pressure is on Hillary.
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05/07/clintons-longevity-in-jeopardy-after-indiana-squeaker/
Clinton is under pressure to bow out, I say keep fighting Obama. If Clinton sticks around she will get some victories in Kentucky and West Virginia.
Clinton is under pressure to bow out, I say keep fighting Obama. If Clinton sticks around she will get some victories in Kentucky and West Virginia.
Tuesday, May 6, 2008
I am going to break some news!!!
Hillary will win Indiana!!! I just can not believe folks have not called that yet.
Carville makes some great points
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/Carville_Democrats_Divide/2008/05/06/93789.html
this type of thougt leads me to believe in 2012 or 16 we will see electoral shift. I do not know how the parties will align, but I think it is coming.
this type of thougt leads me to believe in 2012 or 16 we will see electoral shift. I do not know how the parties will align, but I think it is coming.
This is something to really look at
If you love following elections as I do, this is a link to Karl Rove's polling data. This shows Hillary would be an electoral monster if she was nominated. She would be tough to beat, while Obama seems very beatable interestingly enough he does well for a democrat in Nebraska and North Dakota.
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05/06/raw-data-karl-rove-co-electoral-college-polling-trends/
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05/06/raw-data-karl-rove-co-electoral-college-polling-trends/
according to Drudgereport.com
Obama will secure a win in North Carolina, while I believe Indiana will go for Clinton. Hillary has created a divide in the party. John Mccain will need to exploit. Mccain must win working class white Democrats to win the election.
Who will win tonight?
Hillary must win Indiana. If Obama is able to win Indiana despite all this bad press he has recieved I would have to say he is the nominee.
Monday, May 5, 2008
calling the media thugs out.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/05/roland.martin.05.05/index.html
Ro Martin is a snob, Obama was a member of Wright's church. That is the point martin, no one would be complaining if Wright had simply endorsed Obama, Wright is his pastor. Great biased delusional Martin. I am not justifying any conservative church, that's not the point, the point is there is no double standard in criticizing a politician who wants to president based on his attending a church that hates America. I think Americans know the difference.
Ro Martin is a snob, Obama was a member of Wright's church. That is the point martin, no one would be complaining if Wright had simply endorsed Obama, Wright is his pastor. Great biased delusional Martin. I am not justifying any conservative church, that's not the point, the point is there is no double standard in criticizing a politician who wants to president based on his attending a church that hates America. I think Americans know the difference.
Barack's most proud acheivement?
http://fdd.typepad.com/fdd/2006/01/alert_saddams_c.html
trying to ensure that Saddam remained in power. Is this the leadership we want? In all his political motivations it seems as though Barack only wishes Saddam was still around to torture and ruin more Iraqi lives.
trying to ensure that Saddam remained in power. Is this the leadership we want? In all his political motivations it seems as though Barack only wishes Saddam was still around to torture and ruin more Iraqi lives.
McCain and Hispanics
I think it is important that we seal the borders as most Americans do, however in the article McCain brings up the important point that Hispanics share our conservative values. I think once we get a tough, but fair immigration policy Hispanics will become a conservative stronghold.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/05/mccain/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/05/mccain/index.html
Howard Delusional Deal
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/Dean_Accuses_Republicans_/2008/05/05/93456.html
Democrats don not do this kind of stuff.
Democrats don not do this kind of stuff.
Sunday, May 4, 2008
The Audacity of Lying
(in the youtube generation)
I have truly become inspired by Obama's work. This pathological lying machine will lie directly in to the camera as if he is Richard Nixon. Obama will say he is for a new kind of politics. Then he will distort McCain's words on the economy, repeat what Mccain actually said as his own words, and proceed to say McCain is more of the same, while he is different. What of the females on a show filled with females on a network television show, working as a hit women for Barack says( I paraphrase)" You do such and such like President Bush and such and such, and then she says he hired Karl Rove, to which McCain responds effectively no I did not and then she just says oh same thing. This leads my to my point, Obama values lies and distortion so much that he is willing to do it even if it goes against his message and he knows he will get caught. I believe what Barack is trying to teach American is that he loves to lie with a passion and he is willing to do it no matter what the consequences and so American you should do what you love no matter the consequences. That is audacity.
I have truly become inspired by Obama's work. This pathological lying machine will lie directly in to the camera as if he is Richard Nixon. Obama will say he is for a new kind of politics. Then he will distort McCain's words on the economy, repeat what Mccain actually said as his own words, and proceed to say McCain is more of the same, while he is different. What of the females on a show filled with females on a network television show, working as a hit women for Barack says( I paraphrase)" You do such and such like President Bush and such and such, and then she says he hired Karl Rove, to which McCain responds effectively no I did not and then she just says oh same thing. This leads my to my point, Obama values lies and distortion so much that he is willing to do it even if it goes against his message and he knows he will get caught. I believe what Barack is trying to teach American is that he loves to lie with a passion and he is willing to do it no matter what the consequences and so American you should do what you love no matter the consequences. That is audacity.
Obama distortions and patterns of lies.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgULuRYKYFA&NR=1
John Mccain gives a thoughtful reasonable answer to a tough question from a jack ass (democrat), Obama offers distortions. Who do you want as your president?
John Mccain gives a thoughtful reasonable answer to a tough question from a jack ass (democrat), Obama offers distortions. Who do you want as your president?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
